Lyrics and vocals by Timothy Charles Holmseth on May 16, 2017 at 10:08 A.M.
by Timothy Charles Holmseth on November 8, 2016, 7:28 P.M. CST
Disgraced East Grand Forks gypsy mayor Lynn Stauss has been run out of office and will leave in complete shame.
Steve Gander will replace Stauss as EGF mayor.
Lynn Stauss, along with his con artist brother Dan Stauss, and a band of local gypsies including EGF city attorney Ronald Galstad, was exposed after a secret society theft ring stole over one half million dollars in a scheme known as Boardwalk Enterprises.
Lynn Stauss caused great embarrassment to the small Northern Minnesota town’s residents that he and the gypsies betrayed.
East Grand Forks residents recall the embarrassing spectacle Lynn Stauss made after the gypsies got busted. Lynn Stauss quickly checked himself into a hospital with a fake medical problem and told the nurse he was too sick to take phone calls from the media.
East Grand Forks and Polk County, Minnesota is widely known for Valley News Live media investigations into ritualistic abuse of prisoners at the local police department and mysterious unsolved deaths.
Gander has expressed a love for the community.
Complaint alleges Ronald Galstad legally represented City of EGF and Boardwalk simultaneously
by Timothy Charles Holmseth on August 15, 2016, 11:36 A.M. CST
Ronald I. Galstad, the attorney contracted by the City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota is the subject of a formal complaint filed to the Minnesota Lawyer’s Professional Responsibility.
Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
East Grand Forks, MN
August 15, 2016
Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102-1218
This complaint is against Attorney Ronald I. Galstad. Galstad is an attorney licensed to practice in the state of Minnesota. Galstad has a private practice that contracts to represent the City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota.
Clear and convincing evidence exists to show Galstad is in violation of; but not limited to:
- Rule 1.7: CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CURRENT CLIENTS
- Rule: 1.9: DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS
- Rule 1.11: SPECIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FOR FORMER AND CURRENT GOVERNMENT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
- Rule: 8.4: MISCONDUCT
Evidence shows Attorney Ronald I. Galstad provided legal representation to Boardwalk Enterprises, Boardwalk Bar & Grill (hereby referred to as “Boardwalk”), and the City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota, at the very SAME time; in the SAME meeting; regarding the SAME matter.
On May 7, 2014 Galstad was the attorney for the City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota.
During a meeting held at his private law office located within the Boardwalk Complex at 411 2nd Street N.W., East Grand Forks, Minnesota, he provided legal representation to the City of East Grand Forks; while also providing legal representation to Boardwalk.
Boardwalk and City of EGF were adversaries during the meeting, and two years later Boardwalk filed a civil lawsuit against City of EGF.
The may 7, 2014 meeting was held in response to an audit that discovered Boardwalk had not repaid a loan from the East Grand Forks Economic Development and Housing Authority.
On April 30, 2014 the Grand Forks Herald reported “$510,000 loan from City of East Grand Forks to Boardwalk Enterprises goes unpaid for 10 years.”
OVERVIEW – THE BOARDWALK ENTERPRISES SCANDAL
The Boardwalk Enterprises scandal involves what was clearly fraud and financial crimes comprised of a conspiracy by public officials and well placed individuals (family, friends, etc.) to steal over one half million dollars of government money using a scheme devised to loan money from the Economic Development and Housing Authority (EDHA) that came from a federal Community Block Grant Fund; and then not pay it back.
The original plan was basic and simple – loan the money; use people on the inside of the city government (e.g. EDHA Director, City Attorney, etc.) to eliminate the paper trail and make all existence of the loan disappear so no payments would be required; then, use the money to build a huge lucrative entertainment complex in East Grand Forks called ‘The Boardwalk’ and become personally rich with profits.
Grand Forks Herald publication records show that in 2011 the building was owned by Dan Stauss; he is the brother of EGF Mayor Lynn Stauss.
The Boardwalk scandal was a highly publicized ongoing news story and troves of information can be found regarding the matter on the Web.
ILLEGAL MEETING and CRIMINIAL CONSPIRACY
On May 7, 2014 WDAZ-TV reported that David Murphy, administrator, City of EGF, told a reporter that city officials met with “representatives” of “Boardwalk Enterprises” and their “attorney”.
WDAZ reported the May 7, 2014 closed door meeting was held at the private office of EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad (as opposed to EGF City Hall) at the Boardwalk complex to discuss the un-paid loan.
All available evidence shows Galstad was the ONLY attorney at the meeting between the two Parties.
In a letter dated July 27, 2016, responding to a public records request, Administrator Murphy told me the City of EGF did not keep minutes or a record of who attended the May 7, 2014 meeting because there was not a quorum present and it was an “informal” meeting.
The only attorney reported by WDAZ to be at the May 7, 2014 meeting was Galstad.
I allege Galstad was the attorney for BOTH the City of EGF and Boardwalk during the May 7, 2014 meeting.
The May 7, 2014 meeting was nothing less than criminal and conspiratorial activity by participants deeply involved in state and federal crimes. The secret meeting, which clearly violated the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, involved proactive efforts of EGF City officials, City Attorney, and the City Administrator to form a game-plan how to avoid prosecution for fraud against the State of Minnesota and the U.S. government.
Records show the City of EGF city council knew the activity was illegal.
On May 27, 2014 Boardwalk requested all documents the City of EGF possessed regarding the un-paid $510,000 loan.
On May 27, 2014 Galstad gave a presentation to the EGF EDHA board during a public meeting. He gave a summary rundown of what his internal investigation had determined thus far regarding the un-paid loan. The fact-pattern exposed through Galstad’s presentation created enormous questions, because files showed crucial documentation regarding the loan simply did not exist – as if all traces of the loan had simply disappeared.
Essentially – Galstad had been allowed by the EGF city council and City Administrator to conduct an investigation of himself.
That fact is demonstrated by the actions of City of EGF city council on June 3, 2014.
On June 3, 2014 WDAZ reported the East Grand Forks city council voted to hire Attorney Brad Sinclair to represent EGF regarding the unpaid loan. Sinclair replaced Galstad for purposes of the ‘Boardwalk’ issue. “This is just for removing any questions of conflict of interest or just to get a neutral third party to look at it.” Administrator Murphy said.
The aforementioned action by the EGF city council and statement by Administrator Murphy to the media shows the City of EGF factually knew there was a ‘conflict of interest’ issue and Galstad was not a “neutral” party.
Therefore – between April 30, 2014 and June 3, 2014, the City of EGF (city council and staff) and Attorney Galstad factually knew there were conflict of interest issues and all Parties conspired to conceal that information from the public and law enforcement.
ATTORNEY GALSTAD REMAINED INVOLVED
Evidence shows the hiring of Attorney Sinclair to represent City of EGF regarding Boardwalk did not keep Galstad from being involved.
Two years later, on June 7, 2016, the Grand Forks Herald reported Boardwalk filed a lawsuit against the City of EGF regarding Boardwalk Enterprises.
On Jun 7, 2016 Ronald Galstad (acting as City Attorney) declined to turn a copy of the lawsuit over to the media and stated it had been submitted to the League of Minnesota Cities for insurance purposes.
“And then the league, we’re anticipating, will assign it to an attorney to represent us,” Galstad told the Herald.
The Herald further reported on June 7, 2016 that Mark Anfinson, the attorney for the Minnesota Newspaper Association, said the city is “definitely required to provide a copy of the summons and complaint upon receipt, regardless of whether they’ve been filed with the court.” He cited a section of Minnesota’s Government Data Practices Act.
Therefore, Galstad, having received an official document/communication on behalf of the City from Boardwalk and their attorney, refused to turn it over to the media. Thus – he is engaging in blatant obstruction while continuing to attempt to create the false appearance that he is not involved.
Evidence show Galstad was HEAVILY involved.
Galstad was clearly involved in negotiations regarding a pending settlement.
On June 28, 2016, the Herald reported “City Attorney Ron Galstad cited a “short timeframe to draft up all the settlement documents to get approval.” The City Council met in a closed-door meeting Monday evening to discuss a possible settlement.
“We just weren’t able to do it, to finalize it today,” Galstad added. “There is a settlement agreement being drafted right now.”
On June 29, 2016 the Herald reported, “The council approved a settlement agreement that stipulates Boardwalk Enterprises, the entity that owns the commercial building at 415 Second St. N.W., and Boardwalk Bar and Grill pay $250,000 in cash. City staff members first said in April 2014 a $510,000 loan to Boardwalk Enterprises went unpaid for more than a decade.”
The Herald further reported, “In a joint news release, the city, the EDA, Boardwalk Enterprises and Boardwalk Bar and Grill said they were “pleased to announce that they have resolved all disputes between them.”
“The settlement is based on all parties recognizing the expense and risks of not bringing their disagreements to a close,” the brief statement added.
GALSTAD IS PAID
On August 7, 2016 the Herald reported, “The legal costs detailed in the city spreadsheet show $33,142.12 was paid to the Kaler Doeling law firm, from which the city hired attorney Brad Sinclair, as well as $25,117.99 to City Attorney Ron Galstad. Another $10,444.85 was labeled under “appraisal and consulting.”
Galstad was actually paid fees to commit and conceal felonies.
Galstad has defrauded the local tax-payers as well as the state and federal government.
The “risks” that were noted by the City and Boardwalk are concerns over criminal prosecution for fraud by involved public officials.
The actors in this crime have not been required to pay back over a quarter of a million dollars from the original $510,000 that was stolen from the taxpayers from government funds.
The settlement agreed upon required Boardwalk to pay $250,000.
However, nearly $70,000 in legal fees were paid out by the victim-public-taxpayers to the predator government officials to pay for attorneys – including an attorney (Galstad) who was/is involved in the crimes.
The ‘settlement’ is illegal because upon an investigation, the true facts and circumstances surrounding the ‘settlement’ shows both Parties used a ‘settlement’ to avoid criminal prosecution.
Galstad is deeply involved in state and federal crimes that warrant a thorough investigation, which I am hereby requesting.
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Resident/East Grand Forks, Minnesota
EGF citizens and taxpayers are the bad guys
by Timothy Charles Holmseth on June 10, 2016, 12:09 P.M. CST
What is love? Puppies? Candy?
‘Just $510,000 from people like you, can help build a huge profitable complex called Boardwalk Bar and Grill for people like me’
Polk County court records show a Notice of Filing was entered on June 9, 2016, for a lawsuit filed by Boardwalk Enterprises LLP, Boardwalk Bar and Grill LLC. vs. The City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota, East Grand Forks Economic Development and Housing Authority of East Grand Forks.
Judge Jeff Remick has been assigned to the case.
Jon R. Brakke is listed as the attorney for Boardwalk. The City of EGF is listed as PRO SE.
BOARDWALK ENTERPRISES SCHEME FOR DUMMIES
Here’s what happened.
Public officials and secret society members conspired to enrich themselves by taking out a government loan and then using men/women on the inside, including the Economic Housing and Development Director (and his married girlfriend in the EGF office) and City Attorney to make the loan disappear from the record.
They used the money to build a swanky and very profitable facility called the Boardwalk complex. Neither side of the now filed court case ever said a word about the loan payments that were not being made.
They all thought they were real cute during their private meetings.
And a decade passed.
EVEN A SIX YEAR OLD…
Even an intelligent six year-old can understand that after a person takes out a very large bank loan, the person that loaned the money knows they are supposed to be making regular payments on the loan.
Nobody involved in the criminal fraud said anything because they were all going to financially benefit – it was free money.
EXAMPLE CO-CONSPIRATOR – RONALD GALSTAD
One example of a conspirator in the Boardwalk Enterprises scheme is EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad. He is still the City Attorney even though he was involved in the original scheme and re-located his law firm’s office into the Boardwalk complex.
Galstad is on both sides.
He is on the City of EGF side as the city’s attorney- and he is (secretly) one of the conspirators that hid the paperwork so they would not have to pay the loan back.
The EGF city council sits around and acts like that’s just fine, which might provide some insight into who else might be involved.
Galstad should be disbarred from law practice and criminally charged with the felonies he has committed.
Mayor Lynn Stauss conspired with his family and others to steal the money and get rich. They are un-charged felons and should be arrested.
Instead – taxpayers will have to fund a defense against a lawsuit against the City brought by warring co-conspirators that are elected officials and paid employees of that very same City.
They couldn’t solve the problem during their secret society meetings so now they want you, the tax payers, to pay them some more money for “defaming” them and being “malicious”.